Judicial activism : judicial practice beyond legal formalism 司法實踐超越法律形式主義
Legal formalism in jurisprudence 法理學中的法律形式主義
In general jurisprudence , we might associate the ex post perspective with legal formalism 在一般法理學領域內,我們可能會將事后視角與法律形式主義聯系在一起。
Holmes ' s critiques of legal formalism and law ' s normativity , without more , could easily be dismissed as nihilistic 如果不作進一步了解,霍姆斯對法律形式主義和法律的規范性的批評,很容易被人作為虛無主義而不予理會。
Confronted with the impact and i nfluence , only do we wriggle out of the ties bound by formalism and burst through the limitations of our thought whence traditional legal mode sprung , we can better perceive economic law and legality construction of market economy in china 面對經濟法對傳統法律模式和法學知識體系的挑戰,我們只有擺脫法律形式主義的束縛,突破傳統法律模式設置的思維限制,才能更好地認識經濟法、更好地促進經濟法和我國市場經濟法制建設的發展。
Along the thread , the author analyzes new legal characters of economic law in legal substance legal reasoning legal profession and legal institution , which are distinguished from traditionalistic law such as civil law administrative law , etc . the author puts forward a thesis that economic law is weberian substantive rational law or p ? nonet and p ? selznick ' s responsive law but not formal rational law or autonomous law 認為經濟法對法律形式主義的激烈反叛,即經濟法的實質化特點,表明了經濟法是一種馬克斯?韋伯所稱的實質理性法或者如諾內特和塞爾茲尼克所說的回應型法,而非傳統法律模式所體現的形式理性法或自治型法。